Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > And not to name names, but I don't think relaxing the review process is > the right solution because even in the current system I've seen some > developers come out of the NM queue with still *way* too much learning > ahead of them to justify trusting them to make independent decisions as > developers. That's a failure of that developer's advocate and AM, but how often does that happen? I've been watching the NM queue for about a year now, and I've only seen maybe 2 developers get through who I thought were not ready. However, there's probably several dozen who *are* ready but are still waiting. -- My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy. It's over here in a jar. Would you like to see it?
Description: PGP signature