[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 transition in unstable

On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 12:49, Steve Langasek wrote:

> This conclusion doesn't follow from the facts.  Either the build machine
> is up to date, in which case g++ already points to g++-3.2; or it's not,
> in which case additional hints added to another package that's also
> out-of-date won't help at all.  

Yes, but at least we have a rather unequivocal statement somewhere that
Debian requires gcc 3.2 to build packages now.

> Either way, a change to the build-essential package itself buys you nothing.

It doesn't actually solve the technical problem, I agree.

Reply to: