[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 3.2 transition



On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 05:54, Anthony Towns wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:56:17PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:00:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 07:54:32PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > We may need to add in our release notes: "We broke ABI, please recompile 
> > > > from source", 
> > > Well, yes. "We updated GCC which breaks the C++ ABI; if you have
> > > complicated C++ programs, please rebuild them."
> >   ^^^^^^^^^^^
> >  this should read "any" instead of complicated,
> >  shouldn't it?
> 
> No. You only need to do so if you link against C++ libraries other
> than the standard libraries and Qt. libapt-pkg for example. I presume
> the people who actually write release notes can come up with a better
> phrasing; but "any" isn't correct.
> 
"local" ?  After all, they go in /usr/local by default.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant     Have you ever, ever felt like this?  Had strange
http://netsplit.com/      things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: