Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:27:22PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:20:39PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > That's a recursive definition. "The way things are now" is our current
> > social contract, so you are saying "The way things are now is consistent
> > with the way things are now." I suppose that could be taken as an axiom,
> > but I don't see any useful benefit to it :-)
>
> I'm aware that the definition is somewhat tautological. But my opinion
> remains that our users are currently better served by the status quo than
> what you are proposing.
Ahh but John is not working in the interests of our users but rather a
higher body known as the "Free Software Community." It is not known
whether any actual Debian user is a member of that group at this time
(the answer to THAT question when asked was just as obtuse).
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: