[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian versioning scheme (r1 vs .1)

Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:23:39AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > While Joey's doing a superlative job, I think you're being a bit optimistic
> > on how much help it'll be:
> i was refering to the weekly news, that it is important to make the work of
> those pecial lists more transparent.

But it's not sufficient apparently.  And as usual, you should not rely on
third-party's work...

> > 	http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2000/41/
> > 	  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce-0012/msg00012.html
> > 	http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2001/6/
> Great, I gues this mail should be quoted in dwn .)

Err?  It was quoted from DWN, why should it included in it again?



Reading is a lost art nowadays.  -- Michael Weber

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Reply to: