Re: Debian versioning scheme (r1 vs .1)
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:13:14PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 10:55:16PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Apparently nobody[1] wants to have anything to do with boot-floppies
> > anymore, so your argument seems bogus unless you do it yourself. Sorry,
> > I don't want to be rude, but this seems to be the situation today.
>
> apparently this was the case for the last installer, too. I did not know
> that bf are already considered retired? Wont the new debian installer not
> use them, too?
No. b-f was scheduled to die after potato. The new d-i wasn't ready.
So we resurrected them provisionally.
D-i is completely independent and _people need to finish it instead of
complaining about the release cycle_.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: