* Junichi Uekawa (dancer@netfort.gr.jp) wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:37:54 -0400 > Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org> wrote: > > > The automake saga continues. We now have 4 automake packages in > > unstable: automake, automake1.5, automake1.6 and automake1.7. They all > > work or don't work on various Makefile.am's and various versions of > > autoconf. I was hoping we could get automake1.5 out of archive, > > because it is buggy and out of date, but there are still quite a few > > packages that depend on it. > > > automake1.5 was released as part of stable release, > what would be its upgrade path ? If it were removed from the archive? I guess there wouldn't be one, other then the other automake packages. I suppose we could have the other packages conflict with automake1.5 to get it off the system. -- Eric Dorland <dorland@lords.com> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgptGZ1ethRmJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature