Le ven 18/10/2002 à 09:46, Blars Blarson a écrit : > What I propose is a sort of moderation by self-appointed committee. > Software would pass any obvious non-spam along (signed by debian > developer or low spamassassin score) then hold anything else for > review. Reviewers would log in to a web page, and messages would be > displayed with choices of spam, non-spam, inappropriate for list, and > undecided (give to someone else). Messages approved enough > randomly-selected reviewers would be approved. Messages not > sufficiently reviewed for a period of time (12 hours?) would be passed > on to the list. Rejected messages would be sent back with an > explanation. This looks nice, but maybe a bit too heavy. Why not simply send a CONFIRM request to the authors of mails that don't pass the automatic tests (GPG signature or less than 3.0 with spamassassin), like we already do with subscribtions ? The code is almost already here. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature