[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITP: Intel e1000 gigabit NIC driver kernel module

On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:23:31AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> >I realise we're talking about a package with a limited lifespan, but
> >consider that the standard kernel for woody was still 2.2 with the option
> >of 2.4.  I think it's safe to suggest that sarge will not be using 2.6 or
> >3.0 or whatever they wind up calling it as its primary kernel.
> Maybe not, but it ought to be using the latest 2.4 kernel, which will
> have the intel driver in it by the time sarge is released. Given the
> choice between choosing a kernel with the driver included as opposed to
> an older kernel without the driver and a hideous (difficult for users)
> module package, I'd suggest choosing the kernel with the driver
> included.

Certainly agreed.  I was not aware that the driver had become part of
2.4.20pre.  Knowing that, I affirm the statement that e1000-source is not
likely needed at this point.

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net>      Intelligent backside at large
## a_nick (nobody@c213-89-87-111.cm-upc.chello.se) has joined #python
<a_nick> how do i add a new key to a dictionary?
<a_nick> nm
<dash> heh :)
<dash> behold the problem-solving power of #python.

Attachment: pgpqvUl7p6fUl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: