On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:23:31AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > >I realise we're talking about a package with a limited lifespan, but > >consider that the standard kernel for woody was still 2.2 with the option > >of 2.4. I think it's safe to suggest that sarge will not be using 2.6 or > >3.0 or whatever they wind up calling it as its primary kernel. > > Maybe not, but it ought to be using the latest 2.4 kernel, which will > have the intel driver in it by the time sarge is released. Given the > choice between choosing a kernel with the driver included as opposed to > an older kernel without the driver and a hideous (difficult for users) > module package, I'd suggest choosing the kernel with the driver > included. Certainly agreed. I was not aware that the driver had become part of 2.4.20pre. Knowing that, I affirm the statement that e1000-source is not likely needed at this point. -- Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> Intelligent backside at large ## a_nick (email@example.com) has joined #python <a_nick> how do i add a new key to a dictionary? <a_nick> nm <dash> heh :) <dash> behold the problem-solving power of #python.
Description: PGP signature