Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)
Le Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:06:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
> That's not a particularly valid question. It wasn't put there so as to
> avoid grumpy maintainers removing legitimate NMUs, and because it doesn't
> serve any particularly useful purpose.
Why was it put then ?
> And we're still at the point where NMUs need to be encouraged and
> supported, rather than stomped on.
Be assured that I do promote NMUs too as you do. Just look how I
updated developers-reference wrt NMU rules.
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com