Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:16:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Technically it wasn't. The upload is still in the DELAYED queue, which
> > is really just a convenient automated way of saying "I'll NMU this
> > package in <n> days if I don't hear anything", with the added bonus of
> > allowing the maintainer to poke at it and see exactly what would go in
> > in the absence of a maintainer upload. I usually explain this when using
> > the delayed queue.
> I assume you also submit a bug.
> Do you generally do this without leaving a bug for a few days first?
In the case of the perl transition I've been given to understand by the
actions of other developers that the -devel-announce post on 31st July
was enough. Otherwise no.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]