[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)



On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:16:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:06:20PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> > The NMU was made before I was in any way contacted.
> 
> Technically it wasn't. The upload is still in the DELAYED queue, which
> is really just a convenient automated way of saying "I'll NMU this
> package in <n> days if I don't hear anything", with the added bonus of
> allowing the maintainer to poke at it and see exactly what would go in
> in the absence of a maintainer upload. I usually explain this when using
> the delayed queue.

I assume you also submit a bug.

Do you generally do this without leaving a bug for a few days first?

-- 
Elie Rosenblum                 That is not dead which can eternal lie,
http://www.cosanostra.net   And with strange aeons even death may die.
Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer             - _The Necronomicon_



Reply to: