Re: Wish: Unfreeze Woody and start anew
Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> This is not a contest; Debian is about providing the best Free
> Operating System that we can make, not just about market share. Today,
> making the best Free OS that we can means sticking out the release
> delays, knowing that when woody does come out it will remain the most
> secure and best integrated Linux distro available.
Sure I know about this general statement. But in the precise case I was
talking about, we know there is a timing issue and what happened with
XFree 4.2 is not a mechanical consequence of the above statement. IIRC,
and Branden will yell if I am wrong, XFree 4.2 was (months ago) not
thrown to unstable *because* Branden, like many others, thought that
woody would release sooner. So the delay for this package is a bit
artificial: I mean, it is not just a consequence of the requirements for
"providing the best free OS that we can make" (i.e., mainly, testing the
packages before labelling them "stable").
But I *don't* want to start another huge thread. I just want to make
people who say "woody is not released, but you can use it, so what's
your problem?" realize that they didn't grok the whole picture.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org