On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:26:44PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > Have any proof to back up these charges? (It sounds like you do.) > > I have email with the maintainer, and he has email with Transgaming. He > is trying not to anger Transgaming in the hopes that they may let him at > least have the package outside of Debian (which he indicates they seem > willing to allow..) > > I'm not feeling very diplomatic in the face of threats. Marc has told me > what was said and who said it. I do not doubt Marc's integrity. > > > > I wonder how evil Transgaming has to get before you > > > would stop defending them. > > > > Actually show me (instead of ranting on and on about the atrocities > > they've committed against you, your dog and your sister) one thing that > > they've done which has been directly against the community and I will > > reconsider my position. Trying to get some form of recompense for the > > code they've written doesn't count, btw, so you can't say "They didn't > > give all the code they developed back!" And they _have_ given code back > > - see http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-license/2002/05/0051.html . > > Since you seem to doubt that the good people at Transgaming would do such > a thing, I ask Marc for a reference. I think it should not be > unreasonable to post the email in question given that it concerns Debian > business and they certainly cannot expect Debian to not know what they > have decided to tell us, through him. It would be nice to see this email in debian-devel. Christophe -- Christophe Barbé <christophe.barbe@ufies.org> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about. -- John von Neumann
Attachment:
pgpE0uMNgBcmm.pgp
Description: PGP signature