Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 19:40, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> I'm philosophically opposed to that, and think anyone else designing a
> human-computer interface ought to be to.
You could argue this isn't meant to be the human-computer interface, but
a low level tool. (I am not sure what the Hurd people will think of
this).
For instance, it would be easy to have a wrapper (whether GUI or text
based) that searches for the translator for you and then calls settrans.
The only real issue I have with this is: what happens if a translator
moves? Does everything have to be changed?
Such things are really off-topic for this long and endless thread
though.
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: