Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 06:09:42AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > > (btw: Isn't /etc/ld.so.cache a violation of the FHS?)
> > Not much more than /etc/mtab and /etc/rmtab.
> In other words, "yes"?
mtab is not, it's explicitely listed in FHS as a file that needs to be in
/etc. By the same reason, the other files would have to be there. (/var can
be on a partition other than / .)
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org