[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin

Previously Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> If you can't see the difference between a binary and a library it's
> probably unuseful.

The difference is technically really minimal. Look at glibc for
example, which you can run as a normal binary as well.

> I think it's better to not have binaries in /usr/lib.

Why? Do you want to move scripts into /etcexec as well?


 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: