On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 06:18, Roland Mas wrote: > Anthony DeRobertis (2002-05-06 03:20:50 -0400) : > > > (btw: Isn't /etc/ld.so.cache a violation of the FHS?) > > Not much more than /etc/mtab and /etc/rmtab. In other words, "yes"?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part