Re: RFC: very large, redundant packages
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 02:43:14PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Wilmer van der Gaast
>
> | Marco d'Itri@lists.debian-devel@Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:35:21 +0200:
> | > There is. 169.254.0.0/16
> | >
> | Btw, what's the big difference between 192.168.x.x/24 or 10.0.0.0/8 and
>
> 192.168.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/8 (and 172.16.0.0/12) are RFC1918 (aka
> private) addresses. They should not be routed on public networks, but
> may be used on closed networks.
>
> | 169.254.0.0/16?
>
> link-local addresses, typically used when a system bootstraps itself
> using DHCP, etc. Usually not used.
WIndows use it for NetBIOS and SMB. It exists an RFC for how to determine
a unique IP in that address space. I do not remember which now though.
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
> : :' :
> Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just `. `'
> selective about who its friends are. `-
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: