[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: very large, redundant packages



* Wilmer van der Gaast 

| Marco d'Itri@lists.debian-devel@Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:35:21 +0200:
| >  There is. 169.254.0.0/16
| >  
| Btw, what's the big difference between 192.168.x.x/24 or 10.0.0.0/8 and

192.168.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/8 (and 172.16.0.0/12) are RFC1918 (aka
private) addresses.  They should not be routed on public networks, but
may be used on closed networks.

| 169.254.0.0/16?

link-local addresses, typically used when a system bootstraps itself
using DHCP, etc.  Usually not used.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen                                                  ,''`.   
                                                                : :' :   
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just                            `. `'    
selective about who its friends are.                              `-     


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: