Re: RFC: very large, redundant packages
* Wilmer van der Gaast
| Marco d'Itri@lists.debian-devel@Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:35:21 +0200:
| > There is. 169.254.0.0/16
| >
| Btw, what's the big difference between 192.168.x.x/24 or 10.0.0.0/8 and
192.168.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.0/8 (and 172.16.0.0/12) are RFC1918 (aka
private) addresses. They should not be routed on public networks, but
may be used on closed networks.
| 169.254.0.0/16?
link-local addresses, typically used when a system bootstraps itself
using DHCP, etc. Usually not used.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
: :' :
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just `. `'
selective about who its friends are. `-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: