* Jeroen Dekkers (jeroen@dekkers.cx) wrote: > I agreed with the social contract, but I think it should be > changed. Some parts are just wrong, other things are confusing. That certainly looks like a contradiction to me. How do you agree with it if you feel it's wrong? > To talk about the social contract, our priorities are free software > and our users. Somebody is having problems with non-free > software. What is wrong with telling him that the kind of problems > he's having is normal with non-free software and say that there are 2 > free alternatives in Debian which would probably not have those > problems? Nothing is wrong with that. However, that isn't what you said. * Jeroen Dekkers (jeroen@dekkers.cx) wrote: > It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get > the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else > with your vmware problems. (Debian does support plex86 and bochs, BTW) That's the original message you sent which *is* wrong. Debian supports its users regardless of if they run non-free software or not. In fact, we specifically support their running of non-free software and we provide infrastructure (such as our mailing lists) for them. Stephen
Attachment:
pgpOsTaBZnkMp.pgp
Description: PGP signature