Re: Debian doesn't have to be slower than time.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 06:28:07PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I think ideally the stable release would operate just like the testing
> release, but instead of having a 10 day window to proove itself stable
> should require a package to have been in testing for a longer time,
> maybe 30 or 60 days (more?). It would give end users a rolling stable
Well, it seems this is exactly what was presented to me as an plus in
FreeBSD. :-)
> release which would make it on average the most upto date stable release
> of any distro, and buggy packages wouldnt make it in, or be removed.
But what if there's a release critical bug coming up in libc while it
already is in stable?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
Reply to: