[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: another reason why requiring NMs to be sponsored is a bad idea

On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 09:12, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> I think this is the problem we have with sponsorship. We limit judgement
> over prospective developers to their package they want to have sponsored.

I think a person which wrote: "I used to Webmaster for cnn.com, but I am
bored and would like to webmaster all your webservers 24/7" would most
likely find a sponsor. (That is just an example, the webservers work
fine to my knowledge.)

> If such a developer has a package that nobody wants, he is not considered.
> The prospective developer himself reads about the NM process, finds a
> sentence like 'you should have some package being sponsored' and so builds
> some package that nobody wants.

I quote from  http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ :

If you are interested in maintaining packages, then you should look at
our Work-Needing and Prospective Packages list to see what packages need
maintainers. Taking over someone else's package is the best way to start
out as a developer as you can learn from what the previous maintainer
has already done.

There are several things, other than package maintenance, you can
contribute to in Debian. Testing and reporting/fixing bugs is great help
to us, along with helping in writing good documentation, or doing web
maintenance, translation (i18n & l10n), publicity, legal support... our
quality assurance web page lists several possible ways to help.

> The Right Way[tm] IMHO to deal with such 
> situations would be to tell the developer that noone wants his packages 
> and that he should have a look at some orphaned package to take over.

I am a new maintainer and had very good help from my sponsor. So I have
looked over the list over people wanting sponsorship several, to look
for packages that I think are simple enough for me to help with
packageing or interesting enough for me to work with the aspirant in spe
with to get to work. 

I find and the rest of the community can't find packages or prospects
they want to sponsor that is a fine way to have natural selection. We
can't be charged with the task of explaining why that is so! You _might_
want to write a sponsor seeking individual that "you prolly won't get
very far with that programme or package", but that would be a courteous
nicety on behalf of the maintainer, not a service Debian should provide.

>   I would change 'he is looking for a sponsor' into 'he is looking
> for an advocate'. An advocate could check his skills by means of checking
> his packages and then tell him that noone actually wants that package in
> Debian and he has bring something else like an orphaned package.

Then we don't have to change anything.
Lars Bahner,

Nihil est sine ratione cur potius sit, quam non sit.

Attachment: pgpj05Avctwol.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: