Re: license language flamewar [was: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system]
Hi John!
You wrote:
> I'm thinking that maybe my licenses need such a clause,
> as well as one requiring that the license be interpreted under US law.
I don't know if such a clause (that the licence must be interpreted
under US law) is legal. AFAIK, here in the Netherlands, it is not, at
least for commercially bought products.
--
Kind regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi |
| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl | bon le faire? |
| bas@A-Es2.uu.nl | Pablo Picasso |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: license language flamewar [was: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system]
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: license language flamewar [was: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system]
- From: Wolfgang Sourdeau <wolfgang@contre.com>
- Re: license language flamewar [was: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system]
- From: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
- Re: license language flamewar [was: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system]
- From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>