On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:52:42PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > But then, even if they sent mail to nnn-done@bugs.debian.org, the mail could > simply be empty and void of any more information. Although we know that a > close command makes it not possible to enclose information, the -done > address does not enforce one either. It's a psychology thing. When you have to write an e-mail it's much more likely that you will put content in the e-mail than it is that you will use the close command and then remember to write a followup e-mail later on. > So, I really don't see the point. If you have trouble getting an > explanation for a closed bug, you will have to try to work it out with the > person, not with the BTS. There is no way to technically beat an > explanation out of a Debian maintainer. There are ways to defend against user error. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Attachment:
pgpGBgwpAICvd.pgp
Description: PGP signature