Re: Building against testing is good (was: Propossed Project: Odyssey)
* Bernd Eckenfels (lists@lina.inka.de) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:00:37PM -0400, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I believe the default behaviour of the debhelper scripts is responsible
> > for this. I've never myself directly specified that my packages depend on
> > the latest possible libc, but I do run the latest libc, and so when I
> > build my packages, debhelper just picks up that version number.
>
> That is why it is a good idea to build packages on testing instead of
> unstable. That way it is much more likely, that the package has all
> dependencies resolved and can move to testing, quickly after upload.
Only if you're planning to upload binary packages for all architectures.
The autobuilders all run unstable.
Joshua
--
Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com>
Reply to: