solution of sorts and no upload soon (was: Re: apache2: clearing the air [please read])
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 02:41:32PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Daniel> Why do you do that? What's the point? Why not just have
> Daniel> everything unified under /var/www? Makes a lot more sense
> Daniel> to me. (BTW, I believe Debian's are under
> Daniel> /org/foo.bar.baz).
> because that directory is shared by the old server. This causes extra
> clutter (is that file/directory for the old server or the new
> server?). What happens if your old apache setup has conflicting
> directory names?
> Also, if you don't want users to access directories like:
The thing we were counting on is apache implementing the same policy,
but I honestly can't see this happening any time soon. *shrug*.
Anyway, as I have so much work to do, the package is in Thom's hands -
he's going to sit and wait for a sane solution, and then implement that.
Obviously this means you won't see an upload soon.
> then either:
> a) the directory needs to be different. My preference. I don't
> particular care where it is located or what it will be called. Only,
> it should be easy to change the default (perhaps with a symlink).
/var/web or such? But then again, doing that would still break policy.
An amendment still needs to be made.
> b) the old apache needs to be configured to block access to these new
See my first paragraph.
Daniel Stone <email@example.com>
<Slimer> What's brown and sticky?
<Slimer> A stick.