Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:18:51 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87wv2iv50k.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0109270953060.9797-100000@acpl.lib.wy.us> (Russel Ingram's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2001 09:58:59 -0600 (MDT)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0109270953060.9797-100000@acpl.lib.wy.us>

>>"Russel" == Russel Ingram <ringram@acpl.lib.wy.us> writes:

 Russel> I had read the docs and they don't state that if you leave
 Russel> the --revision option off it will stick a custom-1.00 string
 Russel> on your package for you. 

	This has now been fixed in my CVS. As soon as the archives
 open again, this shall be in incoming ...

	manoj
-- 
 I haven't lost my mind -- it's backed up on tape somewhere.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.
  - From: Russel Ingram <ringram@acpl.lib.wy.us>

Prev by Date: Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.
Next by Date: Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.
Previous by thread: Re: Completely OT, just to quickly prove a point.
Next by thread: vim 6.0 packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread