On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> One thing, though. After Branden's NMU of wdm 1.20-11.2,
> /etc/X11/wdm/Xservers has all X server lines commented out. It used to
> be that the postinst would uncomment one if the user requested it that
> wdm be used to manage :0.
>
> Since the debconf default-display-manager mechanism is now used to
> determine which display manager runs, shouldn't wdm/Xservers contain a
> valid server line for :0?
Yes. Did I do that? Oops. Sorry.
When you do your next MU, please also make the following change to the
prerm (see #113070):
if [ "$THIS_PACKAGE" = "$RET" ]; then
db_fset shared/default-x-display-manager isdefault true
db_input critical shared/default-x-display-manager || true
db_go
db_get shared/default-x-display-manager
+ if [ -e $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE ] && \
+ [ "$(cat $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE)" != "$THIS_DISPLAY_MANAGER" ]; then
+ rm $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE
+ fi
message "Please be sure to run \"dpkg-reconfigure $RET\"."
--
G. Branden Robinson | "Why do we have to hide from the
Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?"
branden@debian.org | "Because we use vi, son. They use
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs."
Attachment:
pgpo3iAVpAM5V.pgp
Description: PGP signature