On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:18:49AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > One thing, though. After Branden's NMU of wdm 1.20-11.2, > /etc/X11/wdm/Xservers has all X server lines commented out. It used to > be that the postinst would uncomment one if the user requested it that > wdm be used to manage :0. > > Since the debconf default-display-manager mechanism is now used to > determine which display manager runs, shouldn't wdm/Xservers contain a > valid server line for :0? Yes. Did I do that? Oops. Sorry. When you do your next MU, please also make the following change to the prerm (see #113070): if [ "$THIS_PACKAGE" = "$RET" ]; then db_fset shared/default-x-display-manager isdefault true db_input critical shared/default-x-display-manager || true db_go db_get shared/default-x-display-manager + if [ -e $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE ] && \ + [ "$(cat $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE)" != "$THIS_DISPLAY_MANAGER" ]; then + rm $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE + fi message "Please be sure to run \"dpkg-reconfigure $RET\"." -- G. Branden Robinson | "Why do we have to hide from the Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?" email@example.com | "Because we use vi, son. They use http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs."
Description: PGP signature