[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Potato to Woody upgrade problem

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:40:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 09:28:39AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > On the installation in question the Xservers file has everything commented
> > out. The default-display-manager file contains the line:
> > 
> > /usr/bin/X11/wdm
> > 
> > I put the correct line into the Xservers file and wdm comes up as
> > expected! Thanks! (what process should have put this in?)
> High-priority debconf questions from gdm, kdm, wdm, and xdm.

One thing, though.  After Branden's NMU of wdm 1.20-11.2,
/etc/X11/wdm/Xservers has all X server lines commented out.  It used to
be that the postinst would uncomment one if the user requested it that
wdm be used to manage :0.

Since the debconf default-display-manager mechanism is now used to
determine which display manager runs, shouldn't wdm/Xservers contain a
valid server line for :0?

(wdm maintainer)

| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 

Attachment: pgp6boNEGuwMQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: