Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
From: Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 03:32:05 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010706033205.A21210@rcfile.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010705123323.A21563@bmrb.wisc.edu>
References: <[🔎] 20010704153517.A24241@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010704111236.I3112@think.thunk.org> <[🔎] 20010705222625.A15562@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010705100927.A16067@rcfile.org> <[🔎] 20010705123323.A21563@bmrb.wisc.edu>

On 05 Jul 2001 at 12:33 (-0500), Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
| * Brent Verner (brent@rcfile.org) spake thusly:
| ...
| > I've started a new init/rc system meant to be LSB compliant. 
| ... the idea is to put together perl modules to handle
| > init scripts...
| 
| AAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIEEEEEE! Mama, make the bad thing go away.

Which part is the bad thing?

  b

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@lemon-computing.com>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>

References:
- LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: real LSB compliance
Next by Date: Re: support for multilingual Packages files?
Previous by thread: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
Next by thread: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread