Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:33:23 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010705123323.A21563@bmrb.wisc.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Reply-to: dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010705100927.A16067@rcfile.org>
References: <[🔎] 20010704153517.A24241@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010704111236.I3112@think.thunk.org> <[🔎] 20010705222625.A15562@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20010705100927.A16067@rcfile.org>

* Brent Verner (brent@rcfile.org) spake thusly:
...
> I've started a new init/rc system meant to be LSB compliant. 
... the idea is to put together perl modules to handle
> init scripts...

AAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIEEEEEE! Mama, make the bad thing go away.

Dima (sorry, couldn't resist)
-- 
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home)
http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key
The wombat is a mixture of chalk and clay used for respiration.       -- MegaHal

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>

References:
- LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
  - From: Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>

Prev by Date: Re: potato -> woody upgrade not smooth...
Next by Date: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
Previous by thread: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
Next by thread: Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread