On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:12:36AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Volunteers to help add LSB support for Debian would be wonderful, if
> you could find any takers. And if there are other sections of the LSB
> which turn out to be hard to implement, or where the LSB is
> inconsistent, let us know, and we can try to fix it in the next
> release.
Uh, is there any existing free implementation related code? .lsb packages
that are expected to be able to be installed on compliant distros to
test with, sample implementations of lsb_release, lsb/install_initd,
lsb/remove_initd, and lsb/init-functions, or anything similar? The
"Implementation" stuff seems to be mainly focussed on getting libraries
synced up (as does the spec itself, really).
Hmm, there's a bug in the "System Initialization / Init Script Actions"
section: presumably we know whether start-stop-daemon is included in
the LSB by now.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpVHT5SMoLbK.pgp
Description: PGP signature