Re: LILO
On Fri, 11 May 2001 09:29:54 +0200
Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:39:28AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> One of the main benefit (but not the sole one) is standardization. At
the
> moment, the bootloaders whether implement specific bootstrapping
procedure
> for different flavours of kernels, or chainload. This makes bootloaders
> bigger or weaker. Secondly, the bootstrapping of Linux doesn't allow one
to
> give it, say, the name of the right module to load for a NIC detected by
the
> bootloader. You have to add everything whether in the kernel or in an
initrd
> or other root fs. So, even if Linux works well, it, as well of other
things,
> can be improved.
Wait, you mean to suggest that Linux isn't perfect?
Regards,
Alex.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org>
- References:
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>
- Re: LILO
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: LILO
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org>