Re: LILO
Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org> writes:
> importance. Until it is this way LILO is better because
> it runs better in several archs (read: runs at all). And I noe see why
You mean fewer archs, right?
<quote source="/tmp/lilo-27.1.7/debian/control">
Package: lilo
Section: base
Priority: important
Architecture: i386
</quote>
Not even hurd-i386.
--
hash-bang-slash-bin-slash-bash
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- References:
- LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
- From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>