Re: LILO
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:33:13AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001 09:29:54 +0200
> Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:39:28AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > One of the main benefit (but not the sole one) is standardization. At
> the
> > moment, the bootloaders whether implement specific bootstrapping
> procedure
> > for different flavours of kernels, or chainload. This makes bootloaders
> > bigger or weaker. Secondly, the bootstrapping of Linux doesn't allow one
> to
> > give it, say, the name of the right module to load for a NIC detected by
> the
> > bootloader. You have to add everything whether in the kernel or in an
> initrd
> > or other root fs. So, even if Linux works well, it, as well of other
> things,
> > can be improved.
>
> Wait, you mean to suggest that Linux isn't perfect?
/*blush*/ I will never have the courage to say that...
;)
--
Thierry LARONDE, Centre de Ressources Informatiques, Archamps - France
http://www.cri74.org
PingOO, serveur de com sur distribution GNU/Linux: http://www.pingoo.org
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- References:
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
- Re: LILO
- From: Frederico Muñoz <fsmunoz@sdf.lonestar.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.openfridge.net>
- Re: LILO
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Re: LILO
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- Re: LILO
- From: Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org>
- Re: LILO
- From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>