Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:34:03AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
>
> i vote for alot of binary kernels. but i'd rather see someone comes
> out will better ideas.
if we are voting here, i'd vote for the very minimul number of stock
kernels. if someone wants something more tuned, then roll your own, or
the wonderful idea of some automated hardware detector that tunes a very
nice kernel, along with the required modules (alsa, pcmcia, lids,
crypto)
-john
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Josh Huber <huber@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Josh Huber <huber@debian.org>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: kernel-{image,headers} package bloat
- From: zhaoway <zw@debian.org>