Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Theodore Tso wrote:

>...
> The scary thought that is that someone is actively maintaining e3.asm
> in this day and age --- and it's impressive how much can be done in a
> 12k executable.  It really goes to show how much *bloat* there is in
> many modern programs.  <g>

I've uploaded e3 compressed with gzexe some minutes ago:

-rwxr-xr-x    1 bunk     bunk         8226 Mar 16 01:01 e3

:-)))

> 						- Ted

cu
Adrian

-- 

Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.