Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, chewie@wookimus.net, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
From: Alexander Hvostov <vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:01:57 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010315170157.57e06281.vulture@aoi.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.NEB.4.33.0103160115410.27912-100000@io.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
References: <[🔎] 20010315090158.A16021@think> <[🔎] Pine.NEB.4.33.0103160115410.27912-100000@io.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 01:22:29 +0100 (CET)
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Theodore Tso wrote:
> 
> I've uploaded e3 compressed with gzexe some minutes ago:

Why isn't there a bz2exe, anyway?

Regards,

Alex.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
  - From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@kom.auc.dk>

References:
- Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
  - From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
- Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

Prev by Date: Re: db3 now in unstable
Next by Date: Re: E-commerce made easy
Previous by thread: Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
Next by thread: Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread