Re: e3 (was Re: visudo not vi?)

[Erik Steffl <steffl@bigfoot.com>]

Sam TH wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:01:58AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > The scary thought that is that someone is actively maintaining e3.asm
> > in this day and age --- and it's impressive how much can be done in a
> > 12k executable.  It really goes to show how much *bloat* there is in
> > many modern programs.  <g>
> 
> For a shocking (to me at least) testamonial to this, see the IOCCC
> entry at http://www.ioccc.org/2000/jarijyrki.c
> 
> It's a full spreadsheet, with graphing features.  Try it, it's sort of
> amazing.  And it has a similar line count to Hello World in Java.  :-)

  in case anybody wants to try it you'd better get the Makefile and
sample spreadsheet from:

http://www.ioccc.org/years.html#2000

  it contains quite some info in Makefile without which you cannot
compile it, it uses -D to define constants (instead of defining them in
program)...

	erik