Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
From: jerome.marant@free.fr (Jérôme Marant)
Date: 28 Feb 2001 17:12:31 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 7zg0gypz0w.fsf@amboise.ird.idealx.com>
In-reply-to: Gregor Hoffleit's message of "Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:14:04 +0100"
References: <[🔎] 20010228161404.A1925@mediasupervision.de>

Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@mediasupervision.de> writes:


> I noticed that the tcl8.3/tk8.3 packages still have not yet made their way

  But the way, why are there so many versions of tcl/tk in Debian ? Are all
  these versions really usefull or is this just a matter of not recompiling
  applications against the new libs ?

  Thanks. 

-- 
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr>

-----------------------------------
Debian Activity Page:
http://jerome.marant.free.fr/debian
-----------------------------------

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
  - From: Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>
- Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
  - From: jerome.marant@free.fr (Jérôme Marant)
- Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
  - From: Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>

References:
- State of tcl/tk for woody ?
  - From: Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@mediasupervision.de>

Prev by Date: Re: openldapd (stable) --> slapd (unstable)
Next by Date: Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
Previous by thread: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
Next by thread: Re: State of tcl/tk for woody ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread