On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:11:26AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote: > Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU> writes: > > >>>>> "Adam" == Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > > But he removed the file created by the debconf script in /etc/ssh, > > which IMHO counts as a change of local configuration by the > > administrator under 11.7.3 of policy 126.96.36.199. As such, the upgrade > > script must respect this change. I believe it would be reasonable > > to open a serious bug against ssh for not doing so. See the thread > > about abusing debconf recently. > > It's not a thread about abusing debconf, it's a thread about avoiding > duplicating information in debconf and in the filesystem. you are lying, see !Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:58:33 -0800 !From: Joey Hess <email@example.com> !To: firstname.lastname@example.org !Subject: use and abuse of debconf !Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010114235833.A20384@silk.kitenet.net> Gruss Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org PGP: finger email@example.com -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux The only stupid question is the unasked one.
Description: PGP signature