Re: ITP: bibletime
In Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:08:57 -0600 Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> cum veritate scripsit :
Hi,
> * Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> [010121 13:30]:
> > process and didn't take the time to remind him about the changes
> necessary
> > to the WNPP. So I goofed.
>
> I agree with everyone, though. I ITP'ed a package that wasn't in wnpp
> about a week ago and found out no less than three people had their eyes
> on packaging this at one time or another.
>
> Is it ok to say wnpp is the definitive list? Should I be trusing wnpp
> to be a whiteboard of whats going on?
I don't know what, but if people read the developers-reference in our
"stable" distribution, I am kind of sure that they
will not see a reference to bugging wnpp.
Instead, it probably only tells you about sending mail to
debian-devel@lists.debian.org and checking the archives.
Reading the fine manual in stable doesn't help, and only those
who follow the latest information would know to do it "right".
The situation is rather difficult.
Just expressing my concern about the current situation.
regards,
junichi
--
University: ti0113@mail4.doshisha.ac.jp Netfort: dancer@netfort.gr.jp
Debian: dancer@debian.org
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
Reply to: