[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel depends?

On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> What is wrong with the proposition to make it depend on the virtual
> kernel-assembler and let gas provide that on all other architectures,
> but bin86 on i386?
> This is still a bit like a workaround but sounds clean.

i agree, it *is* a bit of a hack, but at least it's clean and in line with
the way we've handled this in the past.

the completely optimal solution would be to extend dpkg, however... but i'm
not going to volunteer :)


When you are having a bad day, and it seems like everybody is trying to piss
you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4
muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle.

Reply to: