Re: Updating build-essential package list

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Updating build-essential package list
From: jerome@IDEALX.com (Jérôme Marant)
Date: 27 Jun 2000 09:05:51 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 64pup3zjqo.fsf@amboise.ird.idealx.com>
In-reply-to: Joey Hess's message of "Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:46:45 -0700"
References: <[🔎] 20000626134014.A30043@cistron.nl> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0006260721420.1870-100000@home.lameter.com> <[🔎] 20000626162740.A2292@liacs.nl> <[🔎] 20000626144645.R21384@kitenet.net>

Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:
 
> I agree. Consider for example, that debhelper has to keep current with
> changes to debian policy. On the other hand, dpkg and dpkg-dev are the
> bedrock policy rests on, and policy changes very, very rarely require
> them to be changed. This is a useful separation.

I'm convinced now :-)

-- 
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@IDEALX.com>

 -----------------------------------------------------------
| IDEALX - Open Source Engineering / Ingénierie Open Source |
| http://IDEALX.com                                         |
 -----------------------------------------------------------

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Updating build-essential package list
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: Updating build-essential package list
  - From: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
- Re: Updating build-essential package list
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: Updating build-essential package list
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Updates, Removals and Still to do
Next by Date: Re: ITP: libdetect
Previous by thread: Re: Updating build-essential package list
Next by thread: Re: Updating build-essential package list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread