Re: Updating build-essential package list
Previously Jérôme Marant wrote:
> As most of packages build with "debhelper", I think that it would
> be logical to find it in the build-essential package list.
> What do you think about it ?
No, it is not `essential' at all, just often used. None of my
packages use it for example (except for vim, I haven't gotten
around to change that yet).
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |