Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:46:03AM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> > Those are configuration files, and nothing guarantees that the user
> > will use the generic file or fold in the changes made in it. Such
> > dependency wouldn't be reliable.
>
> I think I already pointed out that this is a solvable problem.
Adding "Conflicts: man-db (<< foo)" to each FHS-ized package is still too
much work for too little gain. Plus, it bloats dpkg and apt databases. :)
> > The Release Notes mention in one place that you can't access
> > manpages in /usr/share/man without upgrading man-db. I haven't
> > noticed any bug reports from users saying they can't view some
> > manpages. I don't think anyone will have a major problem with this.
>
> Personally I decided it'd be more sensible to ask here than to submit
> a bug report against every package affected.
Most definitely, thanks.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@sfere.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@sfere.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Steve Greenland <stevegr@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
- Re: /usr/man -> /usr/share/man, etc
- From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@sfere.greenend.org.uk>