Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 10:37:19PM -0700, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > I cannot stand by and watch Debian be destroyed because too many
> > people are more interested in being successfully anti microsoft than
> > successfully pro free software.
> That's a straw man, I'm afraid.
> Personally, I believe: (1) that non-free will wither when it is no
> longer relevant, and (2) in the meantime, the users matter more than
> the pharisaical tithing of ftp server space.
It isn't about the ftp space. The space reclaimed by throwing out
non-free is nominal--woody even without non-free will be larger than
potato with it.
The issue I see, the strongest issue, is that I have witnessed Debian
developers flat out saying that Debian distributes non-free software and
should expand these efforts rather than try to curtail them. This sort of
thing from Debian DEVELOPERS who have all agreed to stand by the social
contract and DFSG is truly disheartening.
The defenders of the last truly free distribution want us to expand our
efforts to support non-free software and are miffed that someone wants to
do the opposite. I didn't say that---THEY DID. This is truly a sad time
to be a developer for this project. And I fear things are getting worse,
Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<Mercury> Knghtbrd: I'd love to see support for xor crosshairs..
<Knghtbrd> Mercury: you're on quack.
<Mercury> Knghtbrd: You're the dealer... <G>
*** Knghtbrd is now known as QuackDealer