Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 12:17:23AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Huh?
> > No developer has to support non-free right now, without any changes to
> > the social contract whatever.
> > What were you saying about straw men, again?
> Cf. Message-ID: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.1000609150904.23095A-100000@dwarf>
Then you've clearly misunderstood Dale's message.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpJInscgg_OH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
- From: Fabrice Gautier <gautier@email.enst.fr>
- My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
- Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
- Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: My present position, in opposition of anything resembling non-free in social contract
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>