Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> What I think I meant was that the compromise was made to meet two
> competing ends: one was the original Debian manifesto, which excluded
> all non-free software, ...
Where in the Debian Manifesto does it exclude all non-free software?
In fact, the Manifesto does not even mention non-free software at all!
If you look further, it hardly mentions free software, except to say
that producing and promoting free software is good. Nowhere, however,
does it say that software that is not free is bad, immoral, or whatever.